PDA

View Full Version : SA Churchill v RR Westwood (battle for 0-3)


mad_fan
09-10-2005, 10:43 AM
1 of these is going to 0-3. I dont know RR Westwood. Any insight? How does Churchill stack up in this game?

mad_fan
09-10-2005, 03:42 PM
1 of these is going to 0-3. I dont know RR Westwood. Any insight? How does Churchill stack up in this game?

what? nobody know nothing?

Reaganrattler07
09-10-2005, 03:48 PM
With Churchill being our rival I hope Churchill loses miserably :p

But being realistic, they need this win...they need to show they can.

mad_fan
09-10-2005, 03:53 PM
With Churchill being our rival I hope Churchill loses miserably :p

But being realistic, they need this win...they need to show they can.

same here, but is westwood a solid team? what have they going for/against them (if you were putting $$$ on the game, not just against a rival)?

Reaganrattler07
09-10-2005, 03:57 PM
To be honest...I don't know much about Westwood, but is this the same team SV beat? I think Churchill's a much better team than what they've been. But they've been playing a district that's in complete disarray. Just look at 27-5A....

mad_fan
09-10-2005, 04:00 PM
ya SV and somebody beat 'em.

Reaganrattler07
09-10-2005, 04:03 PM
Hmm...I don't know. I say Churchill wins it. But it's at Comalander, right? Maybe that'll help a bit.

mad_fan
09-10-2005, 04:07 PM
just looked it up...yes C is at home...

SV 37 RR WW 15
Austin Westlake 50 RR WW 17

beat up more than C in both games, but SV only got 37 on them.

Reaganrattler07
09-10-2005, 04:08 PM
Each time Churchill lost they lost by a touchdown or less....I say Churchill takes this one....but I'm gonna laugh if they're down 7 with a minute left and are trying to get it downfield as quickly as possible...or practically what they've been doing every game this year.

mad_fan
09-10-2005, 04:18 PM
RRWW might have a defense (guessing)(unlike madison, did i type that?). if they do i can see it going their way.

Reaganrattler07
09-10-2005, 04:35 PM
But Churchill lost to Clark....and Clark's not a really good team. And to top that, the district they represent is in shambles.

TexasRed6x
09-10-2005, 04:39 PM
I don't know and don't care, both will not make the playoffs so I hope they have shoot-out and have a great time at it.

mad_fan
09-10-2005, 04:46 PM
I don't know and don't care, both will not make the playoffs so I hope they have shoot-out and have a great time at it.

great, you dont care and might be wrong (about playoffs), welcome to the thread. :) any insight on rr westwood?

Reaganrattler07
09-10-2005, 04:56 PM
Both need a win....should be a good game.

CenTexFan
09-10-2005, 06:21 PM
Mad Fan

Westwood runs a spread offense out of the shotgun, with either a single back or an empty backfield. Against Smithson Valley their QB, Rich threw for 381 yards. Against Westlake they had 64 yards rushing (20 attempts) and 13 for 28 passing for 207 yards, however Westlake had 4 interceptions. They gave up 470 yards against Westlake. They had several very good returns on kick offs. Overall a young team with a new coach that could be dangerous if their offense is on and they can avoid turnovers.

mad_fan
09-10-2005, 08:30 PM
thanks centex

Reaganrattler07
09-10-2005, 09:50 PM
What was the Final Score?

CenTexFan
09-11-2005, 12:15 AM
The score was Westlake 50 - Westwood 17

Reaganrattler07
09-11-2005, 12:19 AM
The score was Westlake 50 - Westwood 17

We were asking about SA CHURCHILL and Westwood....that scores already listed a lil ways up.