PDA

View Full Version : 26-5A vs 5-5A


ScottS
10-24-2006, 04:25 PM
I propose we put every player from 5-5A on the field with every player from 26-5A. Then, randomly, they would drop the ball from above. The sides would then try move the ball to each endzone & we could see which side scores more.

ken-in-rockwall
10-24-2006, 04:27 PM
I propose we put every player from 5-5A on the field with every player from 26-5A. Then, randomly, they would drop the ball from above. The sides would then try move the ball to each endzone & we could see which side scores more.

Isn't that rugby or Australian rules football :D

svhorns
10-24-2006, 04:35 PM
I propose we put every player from 5-5A on the field with every player from 26-5A. Then, randomly, they would drop the ball from above. The sides would then try move the ball to each endzone & we could see which side scores more.
whos dropping the ball from above cause if its Dodge Im gonna have a problem with that...

my3sons
10-25-2006, 12:40 AM
whos dropping the ball from above cause if its Dodge Im gonna have a problem with that...

It would be the "son", JC himself, Riley Dodge, son of G-- (sorry, I can't bring myself to be blasphemous).

Mad Hatter
10-25-2006, 01:05 AM
26-5A would win this hands down. :D

lonny23
10-25-2006, 01:23 AM
26-5A would win that game because they'd just wear 5-5A down. We have some fast, mean defenses in the district and you'd be combining that with top-flight RB's, fast receivers, and a good QB prospect.

AllenEagle06
10-25-2006, 01:59 AM
Most of 5-5A's strength is Carroll, with a select few stand-out players from the rest of the teams. Carroll may be able to beat any team from 26-5A, but it's still a stronger district and would most likely win this "ball drop" game.

lonny23
10-25-2006, 02:36 AM
Most of 5-5A's strength is Carroll, with a select few stand-out players from the rest of the teams. Carroll may be able to beat any team from 26-5A, but it's still a stronger district and would most likely win this "ball drop" game.
A whole district would have a hard time beating a combined Judson/SV team much less letting the rest of 26-5A add players.

svhorns
10-25-2006, 04:14 AM
A whole district would have a hard time beating a combined Judson/SV team much less letting the rest of 26-5A add players.
I agree especially with the Coaches we have...

lonny23
10-25-2006, 04:49 AM
I agree especially with the Coaches we have...
The 3rd quarter of the Judson-Wagner game reinforced everything I've ever seen Judson do.

I was there to see them block an extra point and FG and make a goal-line stand to beat Austin Bowie.

I saw them throw for over 200 yards on Midland and win on a 76-yard TD toss when everybody knows they're a running team.

I was there when Derrick Williams fumbled a kickoff into the end zone and ran it back 106 yards.

I've seen the 78 yard punts.

In the last 2 games last year, Haynes ran back a Westfield fumble to provide the winning margin and James ran a Trinity fumble back 98 yards to give the Rockets a 14-0 lead.

Sure enough, Isaiah Carter ran a fumble back 93 yards when Wagner was about to tie the game on Friday. That put Judson up 21-7 and then they forced 3 more turnovers in the 3rd to be up 41-7 after 3. It was beautiful seeing them run a fumble back to the 16 and an INT back to the 7 and another INT to about the 3. The defense was making it easy to score.

On the offensive end, they're rounding into form in the running game and they just need a little better timing in the passing department. The receivers were open vs. Wagner and Bouldin just couldn't quite connect.

I really like what I saw from the Judson defense. Wagner would have 3rd and short, but Judson would still stop them most of the time. I want a defense that can get short-yardage stops instead of having to force teams into 3rd and long to ever get a stop.

I prefer the SV-Judson method of winning over the overpowering offense that blows out the scoreboard. You don't know what big plays the teams will make, but you expect it. You get big defensive stops, they cause turnovers, block punts, FG's, and all that jazz!:cool:

aclb
10-25-2006, 09:05 AM
How about this. I think a 26-5A All Star team could beat all D3 college teams and a few D2 teams.

blackcat
10-25-2006, 04:22 PM
could you imagine these skill players together:

OFFENSE:

QB: Nick Fanuzzi, Churchill
RB: Devin Thomas, Madison
RB: Marcus Wright, Reagan
Flex: Johnathon Craig, Mac
WR: Dale Kindred, Judson
WR: Malcolm Lindsey, Lee
WR: Andre Odom/Ryan Loftin, Mac
TE: Ian Harris, Churchill

Notable backups: Rios,Resendez,Lewis at RB; Powell,Renken,Drew,Thayer at WR.

DEFENSE:

DB: Randez James, Judson
DB: Dominique Drew, Roosevelt
DB: Travis Constanzo, SV
SS: Travis Lewis, Lee
FS: Roisean Haynes, Judson
LB: Isiah Carter, Judson
LB: (to many options)
DE: Adam Arthur, Mac
DE: Evan Montelongo, Churchill

J-Rock Mom
10-25-2006, 05:12 PM
could you imagine these skill players together:

OFFENSE:

QB: Nick Fanuzzi, Churchill
RB: Devin Thomas, Madison
RB: Marcus Wright, Reagan
Flex: Johnathon Craig, Mac
WR: Dale Kindred, Judson
WR: Malcolm Lindsey, Lee
WR: Andre Odom/Ryan Loftin, Mac
TE: Ian Harris, Churchill

Notable backups: Rios,Resendez,Lewis at RB; Powell,Renken,Drew,Thayer at WR.

DEFENSE:

DB: Randez James, Judson
DB: Dominique Drew, Roosevelt
DB: Travis Constanzo, SV
SS: Travis Lewis, Lee
FS: Roisean Haynes, Judson
LB: Isiah Carter, Judson
LB: (to many options)
DE: Adam Arthur, Mac
DE: Evan Montelongo, Churchill


Another good one is: LB: Dominick Maddox, Judson

dragonsdaddy
10-25-2006, 05:16 PM
How about this. I think a 26-5A All Star team could beat all D3 college teams and a few D2 teams.
the so called all-star teams wouldn't win a 3a state championship. they are simply a collection of talented athletes where gilmer is a talented team.

svhorns
10-25-2006, 05:22 PM
the so called all-star teams wouldn't win a 3a state championship. they are simply a collection of talented athletes where gilmer is a talented team.
huh? this all star team with Coach Hill as the Coach would beat Gilmer...

Gridiron Gopher
10-25-2006, 07:43 PM
could you imagine these skill players together:

OFFENSE:

QB: Nick Fanuzzi, Churchill
RB: Devin Thomas, Madison
RB: Marcus Wright, Reagan
Flex: Johnathon Craig, Mac
WR: Dale Kindred, Judson
WR: Malcolm Lindsey, Lee
WR: Andre Odom/Ryan Loftin, Mac
TE: Ian Harris, Churchill

Notable backups: Rios,Resendez,Lewis at RB; Powell,Renken,Drew,Thayer at WR.

DEFENSE:

DB: Randez James, Judson
DB: Dominique Drew, Roosevelt
DB: Travis Constanzo, SV
SS: Travis Lewis, Lee
FS: Roisean Haynes, Judson
LB: Isiah Carter, Judson
LB: (to many options)
DE: Adam Arthur, Mac
DE: Evan Montelongo, Churchill

Put Joey Gallegos -Mac in at LB

dragonsdaddy
10-25-2006, 07:46 PM
huh? this all star team with Coach Hill as the Coach would beat Gilmer...
so coach hill, in one week could take a bunch of individuals and mold a smooth running organism called a team. i agree if they could play a season together, but all-star teams generally have 4-6 practices together. gilmer would destroy them.

mad_fan
10-25-2006, 07:47 PM
could you imagine these skill players together:

OFFENSE:

QB: Nick Fanuzzi, Churchill
RB: Devin Thomas, Madison
RB: Marcus Wright, Reagan
Flex: Johnathon Craig, Mac
WR: Dale Kindred, Judson
WR: Malcolm Lindsey, Lee
WR: Andre Odom/Ryan Loftin, Mac
TE: Ian Harris, Churchill

Notable backups: Rios,Resendez,Lewis at RB; Powell,Renken,Drew,Thayer at WR.

DEFENSE:

DB: Randez James, Judson
DB: Dominique Drew, Roosevelt
DB: Travis Constanzo, SV
SS: Travis Lewis, Lee
FS: Roisean Haynes, Judson
LB: Isiah Carter, Judson
LB: (to many options)
DE: Adam Arthur, Mac
DE: Evan Montelongo, Churchill


The SA Yankees???

Gridiron Gopher
10-25-2006, 08:00 PM
could you imagine these skill players together:

OFFENSE:

QB: Nick Fanuzzi, Churchill
RB: Devin Thomas, Madison
RB: Marcus Wright, Reagan
Flex: Johnathon Craig, Mac
WR: Dale Kindred, Judson
WR: Malcolm Lindsey, Lee
WR: Andre Odom/Ryan Loftin, Mac
TE: Ian Harris, Churchill

Notable backups: Rios,Resendez,Lewis at RB; Powell,Renken,Drew,Thayer at WR.

DEFENSE:

DB: Randez James, Judson
DB: Dominique Drew, Roosevelt
DB: Travis Constanzo, SV
SS: Travis Lewis, Lee
FS: Roisean Haynes, Judson
LB: Isiah Carter, Judson
LB: (to many options)
DE: Adam Arthur, Mac
DE: Evan Montelongo, Churchill

??? Who is this. Should that be Madison?

jroc09
10-25-2006, 08:11 PM
The 3rd quarter of the Judson-Wagner game reinforced everything I've ever seen Judson do.

I was there to see them block an extra point and FG and make a goal-line stand to beat Austin Bowie.

I saw them throw for over 200 yards on Midland and win on a 76-yard TD toss when everybody knows they're a running team.

I was there when Derrick Williams fumbled a kickoff into the end zone and ran it back 106 yards.

I've seen the 78 yard punts.

In the last 2 games last year, Haynes ran back a Westfield fumble to provide the winning margin and James ran a Trinity fumble back 98 yards to give the Rockets a 14-0 lead.

Sure enough, Isaiah Carter ran a fumble back 93 yards when Wagner was about to tie the game on Friday. That put Judson up 21-7 and then they forced 3 more turnovers in the 3rd to be up 41-7 after 3. It was beautiful seeing them run a fumble back to the 16 and an INT back to the 7 and another INT to about the 3. The defense was making it easy to score.

On the offensive end, they're rounding into form in the running game and they just need a little better timing in the passing department. The receivers were open vs. Wagner and Bouldin just couldn't quite connect.

I really like what I saw from the Judson defense. Wagner would have 3rd and short, but Judson would still stop them most of the time. I want a defense that can get short-yardage stops instead of having to force teams into 3rd and long to ever get a stop.

I prefer the SV-Judson method of winning over the overpowering offense that blows out the scoreboard. You don't know what big plays the teams will make, but you expect it. You get big defensive stops, they cause turnovers, block punts, FG's, and all that jazz!:cool:
Yea i think 26-5 will win cuz we have Judson and SV and Churchill so im pickin 26-5A

rams55
10-25-2006, 09:18 PM
How about this. I think a 26-5A All Star team could beat all D3 college teams and a few D2 teams.

since i play D3 football ( i had bigger offers but declined to play at uscga but i was booted for bad medicle) i can absolutly gurantee that SLC and last years CHHS would dominate in D3 and if your talking about putting a mega district all-star team well hell you might as well compete for the BCS title

lonny23
10-25-2006, 09:27 PM
the so called all-star teams wouldn't win a 3a state championship. they are simply a collection of talented athletes where gilmer is a talented team.
I'll agree on that one, but to be fair, Gilmer should have no more time to prepare than the All-Stars. I'm talking about a July or August game. A December Gilmer team should be facing an All-Star team that played all year, too.

zippy
10-25-2006, 09:28 PM
so coach hill, in one week could take a bunch of individuals and mold a smooth running organism called a team. i agree if they could play a season together, but all-star teams generally have 4-6 practices together. gilmer would destroy them.

He did ok in the All American Bowl a while back. They looked good for the amount of time he had.

StarmanDX
10-25-2006, 11:54 PM
I don't think anyone except Carroll from 5-5a would make the playoffs in district 26.

The only reason the 5-5a teams look good in district play is becaues of all the spread offenses. Whenever a 5-5a team faces a good power running game it gets ugly.

nevaplayedk9
10-26-2006, 11:43 AM
26-5A would win this hands down. :D
tru dat! cake walk:D

svhorns
10-26-2006, 01:26 PM
I'll agree on that one, but to be fair, Gilmer should have no more time to prepare than the All-Stars. I'm talking about a July or August game. A December Gilmer team should be facing an All-Star team that played all year, too.
Gilmer would not beat a 26-5a All star team.... Gilmer has an amazing team... one of a kind actually... but they would not beat the best in 26-5a...

jroc09
10-26-2006, 11:52 PM
5-5A no's they cant live or even breath in 26-5A

StarmanDX
10-27-2006, 12:23 AM
The real question is whether 6-5a last year was as good as 26-5a. The only matchup between the two was Trinity and Judson. 26-5a had better playoff runs but had easier playoff paths, 6-5a had better regular season records.

JoeC
10-27-2006, 12:23 AM
Do you honestly believe that SLC would trust anyone else (especially other athletes from 5-5A) against such a challenge but SLC??? Not!!

bullrock
10-27-2006, 10:43 AM
If you want to go by history, it would take a 265 all-star team to defeat the Dragons. Been close, but no cigar for the 265 against the 55.